Market announcement

AS MERKO EHITUS

LEI code

529900AS1XLZP15O8887

Size of the entity

Large group

Economic activities

Professional, Scientific and Technical Activities

Country of registered office

Estonia

General information

Categories

Other price sensitive information

Unique data record identifier

3900

Submission date and time

22.01.2013 13:00:00

Content of announcement in Estonian

Title

Ringkonnakohtu otsus kriminaalasjas nr 1-09-20251

Message

Tallinn, Eesti, 2013-01-22 12:00 CET (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) --


Tallinna Ringkonnakohtu 21.01.2013 otsusega jäeti muutmata Harju Maakohtu
30.03.2012. aasta süüdimõistev otsus kriminaalasjas nr 1-09-20251 (vt.
börsiteade
https://newsclient.omxgroup.com/cdsPublic/viewDisclosure.action?disclosureId=498
606&messageId=611379).
AS Merko Ehitus esitab otsusele kassatsioonkaebuse seaduses sätestatud 
tähtajal ja korras 30 päeva jooksul. Kavatseme vaidlustada kohtuotsust täies
ulatuses materiaal- ja menetlusnormide olulise rikkumise motiivil sh põhjusel,
et süüdimõistmise aluseks olevad faktilised asjaolud on tuvastatud ebaõigesti
oluliste menetlusrikkumiste tulemusel. 

Otsus ei ole jõustunud, kuid otsuse võimalik rahaline mõju on juba arvesse
võetud AS Merko Ehitus 2011. majandusaasta tulemustes. 

Lisainfo: Leon Glikman, Advokaadibüroo Glikman, Alvin & Partnerid, tel +372 686
0000. 



Viktor Mõisja
Juhatuse liige
+372 680 5105
viktor.mõ[email protected]

Content of announcement in English

Title

District court judgment in criminal case no. 1-09-20251

Message

Tallinn, Estonia, 2013-01-22 12:00 CET (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) --


Tallinn District Court judgment of 21 January 2013 upheld in full the judgment
of conviction by Harju County Court of 30 March 2012 in criminal case no.
1-09-20251 (see Tallinn stock exchange press release
https://newsclient.omxgroup.com/cdsPublic/viewDisclosure.action?disclosureId=498
606&messageId=611378).
AS Merko Ehitus is filing an appeal in cassation within the term of 30 days and
in accordance with procedure set forth in legislation. We intend to challenge
the judgment in full on the basis of material breach of substantive and
procedural norms – on the grounds that the factual circumstances that served as
the basis for the judgment of conviction were established incorrectly as a
result of material violations of procedure. 

The judgment has not entered into force, but the potential financial influence
of the judgment has already been taken into account in the results for AS Merko
Ehitus’s 2011 financial year. 

Additional information: Leon Glikman, Law firm Glikman, Alvin & Partnerid,
telephone +372 686 0000. 



Viktor Mõisja
Member of Management Board
+372 680 5105
viktor.mõ[email protected]